Advocacy

The Shriver Report

Image from: http://www.americanprogress.org

Last week Maria Shriver and the Center for American Progress released The Shriver Report. The report sets to layout “an accurate and detailed portrait of American women and families at this transformational moment in our history.”

According to the report:

Nearly 4 in 10 mothers (39.3 percent) are primary breadwinners, bringing home the majority of the family’s earnings, and nearly two-thirds (62.8 percent) are breadwinners or co-breadwinners, bringing home at least a quarter of the family’s earnings. What’s more, women are now much more likely to head families on their own.

While there has been talk about how the report may not be an accurate representation of American women, I understand that no report or study can be everything to everyone. By the way, kudos to Maria Echaveste on her must-read essay about immigrant women, the “Invisible yet Essential.”

I do think that if we are going to start talking about how we, as women, have the ability to effect change, we must also address the plight of homeless women and their families.

Did you know, for example, that eighty-four percent of families experiencing homelessness are female headedTwenty-nine percent of adults in homeless families are employed.

Here are some facts about homeless mothers from the National Center on Family Homelessness:

Mothers Experiencing Homelessness

The impact of homelessness on mothers is profound. Many are sad, fearful, and hopeless. Mothers who are homeless have been victims of interpersonal violence. For them, the experience of homelessness is another major stressor layered on other traumas.

  • Over 92% have experienced severe physical and/or sexual abuse during their lifetime. For 63%, this abuse was perpetrated by an intimate partner.
  • Mothers experiencing homelessness struggle with mental health issues.
    • About 50% have experienced a major depressive episode since becoming homeless.
    • They have three times the rate of PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) (36%) and twice the rate of drug and alcohol dependence (41%).
  • Mothers often are in poor physical health.
    • Over one-third have a chronic physical health condition.
    • They have ulcers at four times the rate of other women.

The fastest growing population of homeless is women and children. They are on the streets, living inmotelsshelters, and even storage units.

While it is important to celebrate the accomplishments of women in the workplace, it is just as important to address family homelessness not only as a women’s issue, but as an injustice to us all.

What are your thoughts on The Shriver Report? Please post a comment below.

Thank You Squeaky Wheels, Schwarzenegger Listened

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger officially signed SBx3 13, the emergency legislation to reinstatedomestic violence shelter funding for the current fiscal year.*

Hooray! For now. This means many women who are faced with choosing between staying with their abuser or fleeing with their children will have  safe refuge to turn to at these shelters.

Unfortunately, because of his line-item veto this past July, many shelters have already suffered, some have had to close.

From the New York Times:

In the face of the cuts, many shelters across the state had already cut services, including reducing the number of beds, eliminating legal counseling, and laying off staff members.

State Senator Leland Yee, a San Francisco Democrat who had fought for the restoration of funding, added to the chorus of bittersweet praise, saying in a statement that while he was pleased Mr. Schwarzenegger had signed the bill, “I am still dismayed that he would put women and children at risk in the first place.”

We at HAMO are personally glad to hear that some of our partners will not have to close their doors this year.

*Keep it up squeaky wheels! To keep current on this issue, you can join this Facebook page, SAVE Domestic Violence Shelters.

Action Item: Contact the Governator

This is a cross post from St. Anthony’s Foundation blog:

This summer, the Governor, through his line item veto power, eliminated all state funding for domestic violence shelters, leaving shelters across the state without any state-level funding to run their programs.  St. Anthony Foundation has been working to help preserve publicly-funded health and social service programs, and blogged about the “brutal budget” after it was signed. Now that the Senate is back in session, Senator Leland Yee has reintroduced a bill that would restore funding for domestic violence shelters in California.  Senator Yee’s bill, SBX3 13, passed the Senate on Wednesday and is now onGovernor Schwarzenegger’s desk, awaiting his signature.

If you support the reinstatement of funding for domestic violence shelters in California, please take a moment and contact Governor Schwarzenegger and ask him to sign the bill.

New Hope? Congressional Baby Caucus

Photo Credit: Nina Naylor (http://www.ninanaylor.com/)

This past July, US Representatives Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) and Denny Rehberg (R-MT) launched the Congressional Baby Caucus:

The Congressional Baby Caucus aims to ensure that public policy reflects the latest research in understanding how children’s brains are shaped and developed, how positive behaviors can be encouraged, and how investments in early childhood create success in later years, as well as that families are supported with what they need to take advantage of the scientific advances.

“Recent scientific studies on young children and their families have demonstrated that there is a disconnect between what we know is good for America’s children and families versus what we as a country do about it,” said Congresswoman DeLauro. “For this reason, Congressman Rehberg and I founded the Congressional Baby Caucus, which will champion efforts to identify and promote policies that take advantage of these scientific studies in a thoughtful manner to ensure the affect of policies on infants and toddlers is not an after-thought. Our goal is to focus on the opportunities for Congress to use science to dramatically improve the public policy opportunities for children in this country.”

The Baby Caucus wants to start off to specifically address the needs and concerns of active duty military families (e.g., child welfare, child care, early childhood development, education, and prevention of child abuse).

Now, I’m no political wonk. I have no idea how effective legislative caucusing can be. But something about this news gives me hope about us changing the public policy around providing diapers to needy families across the country. Remember, if the government can make cheese, why not diapers?

If enough of us start talking to our legislators in Washington about the health and well being of the country’s tiniest citizens, maybe we can do some good.

What do you all think?

Trickle Down Effect

New census data shows about 160,000 more Californians tumbled below the poverty line. Unfortunately, this isn’t the whole story. The San Jose Mercury News reports:

California and a few other states stood out in one area — while the number of people in poverty grew, the number of Californians just above the federal poverty threshold shrank, perhaps indicating that many low-wage workers lost ground as the recession took hold, experts said.

“They are stressed, and any kind of change in their circumstances is likely to lead them into poverty,” Johnson said.

The stresses are even tougher on Silicon Valley residents than the federal poverty levels indicate because of the high cost of living here.

Many poverty advocates say the federal poverty threshold, a one-size-fits-all definition that covers the entire United States, has much less relevance in places with a high cost of living like Santa Clara County. The federal poverty threshold for a single parent with two children was $17,346 in 2008.

“It’s an absolutely ridiculous number for anywhere where the cost of living is like it is here,” said Carole Leigh Hutton, president and CEO of United Way Silicon Valley.

According to this post, income disparities are greatest in larger cities, including San Francisco, Washington, New York, and Chicago.

Families are just trying to survive. They might not be “mainstream” enough for the 10 O’Clock news, but they are here.

An Open Letter to Food Banks

Does your food bank carry diapers and baby food?

If the answer is no, why not?

I came across this article about how food pantries are seeing an increase in demand. This is not new news, but the interesting part has to do with hygiene items:

“Most of the people who are coming in are new people who we’ve never seen before,” said Roberto Corea, who oversees the food pantry at Hope Chapel Foursquare Church in Hermosa Beach. “Many of them are middle class.”

Last year the local pantry supplied about 125 families each month with groceries and other supplies. This month, more than 300 families are receiving assistance, Corea said.

Many of those who are coming in are also looking for hygiene products and food packages that don’t require cooking, an indication that more families may be homeless, he added.

If families in crisis are seeking assistance from food banks, those with young children also need diapers and most likely baby food.  We have been told many times that the number one item mothers of young children ask about is diapers.

The operations, economies of scale, logistics, and distribution to partner agencies and individuals is all there.

Why not?

Does your local food bank carry diapers and baby food? Leave a comment to let us know.

We’re Gettin’ Cheeky

Photo credit: Whimsical Walney

Our kick off events last week went off with a big bang. Baby Buzz and SadieDey’s Cafe were both hoppin’ with folks who came out to support the cause.  We collected over 5,000 diapers, South Bay and East Bay combined. Additionally, mini-diaper drives are currently underway with various moms groups, local businesses, and individuals. BIG THANK YOU to all came out to kick off Give Cheeks a Chance! Together we are making this month count in the lives of homeless and low income families.

There is still time to contribute! Drop off or donate online by September 30, 2009.

Partners in attendance:

Asian Women’s Home (AACI)Brighter BeginningsWDDCHomeless Prenatal ProgramSacred Heart Community ServiceSan Jose Family ShelterSt. Anthony’s Foundation

Gift bag and raffle sponsors:

Baby Buzz

SadieDeys Cafe

Orchard Supply Hardware

Method

Festoon Salon, Karen Jones

Barefoot and Pregnant

Bath By Bettijo

Mothering Rocks

Little Lamb Design

Diaper Shops

Baby Legs

Sketchers Kids

Puma Kids

Cubes & Crayons, Outside the Cube

Beadzilla

Fog City Charms

Send Out Cards

Motherhood to Otherhood

Align The Self

San Jose Family Shelter

Valley Credit Union

Emmy L Noble at Joyful Waters

Menacing Pickle

Off Ramp Publishing

CJBrasiel

Janet Fouts

California Senate Fails the State’s Most Vulnerable

Yesterday the California State Senate failed to protect the state’s most vulnerable women and their children. Letting partisanship stand in the way, they failed to pass Senator Leland Yee’s emergency legislation to save domestic violence shelters. This was after the State Assembly overwhelming approved the bill on Friday in a bipartisan 63-1 vote.

From Senator Yee:

“I am deeply disappointed that petty Sacramento politics and end-of-session drills were put before the lives of victims,” said Yee.  “It was absolutely vital to approve this legislation.  Failure to pass this bill only puts more lives at risk.  I will reintroduce this bill again and again and again until we finally save our domestic violence shelters.  Anything less is irresponsible, and not only increases health care and law enforcement costs, but puts victims and their children in grave danger.”

What, Honorable Senators, do you say to these women?

“You’ve made your bed, now lie in it?”

Six of the state’s domestic violence shelters have already closed.

Here is a list of shelters in danger of closing. Our partners, Asian Women’s Home and Support Network for Battered Women are both on this list.

Join Save Domestic Violence Shelters Facebook page.

California residents: CLICK HERE to find your State Senator. Please urge them to support the next introduction of the bill.

Meet Veronica, by @CheritaTweets

Photo by Julie Michelle www.femmefotographie.com

There is a motel down the street from where I used to live. It isn’t terribly seedy as far as motels go – in fact, it’s got an almost adorable, cottage-like charm that sort of blends in with the row of cottage-like homes and apartment buildings that line the street. But, it is a motel nonetheless: one room, one bed, no kitchen or microwave, designed for travelers and passer-by in the most temporary of situations. This is my destination for today, where I am to meet Veronica*, her two year-old daughter and her five year old son, all who have been staying at the motel for nearly a month.

The economy is hard right now – many have lost their jobs and their homes and have been forced to turn to motels as a last ditch resort to keep from living on the streets. That isn’t why Veronica stays. She has a rather nice home to go to if she wanted. But, her husband lives there as well, and she doesn’t want to go home to him – she can’t go home to him, for she risked her very life just to leave. You see, Veronica is a battered woman, having suffered countless beatings at the hands of her husband – including a beating so severe, she had to be hospitalized last year.

After over four years of physical abuse and years before that of emotional abuse, Veronica worked up the courage to leave – no small thing, as he continually threatened to kill her should she ever try, and kept tight control over their finances just in case the fear of death wasn’t enough to deter her. But, when her husband began experiencing increased stress at work, Veronica found the beatings increased as well—both in frequency and severity—and when her son began to exhibit violent behavior, she knew she had to risk leaving, not only for her own safety, but also for that of her children.

It seems almost a cruel twist of fate that after finally bolstering the courage to leave and go to a shelter—an act she feared could end her life, and with good cause: the most dangerous time for a battered woman is when she attempts to flee her abuser—Veronica was temporarily turned away and directed to a motel. But, there was only room for one family at that shelter and four hurting women with children all in dire need of safety and, because Veronica had a car and a little money she somehow managed to save, she was given some vouchers and wait-listed. Having long since been estranged from her friends and family thanks to the emotional manipulation of her husband, she had no other choice but to accept the vouchers and wait.

She’s fearful that she might run out of money before space opens up for her at the shelter—the vouchers cover the cost of the motel for a month but, with no kitchen, her food costs are exorbitant—or worse, that her husband might find her at the motel (she isn’t staying under her own name, but the fear is still there all the same). Yet, despite that, she says the past three weeks holed up in one tiny room with her young children, stressful though it is at times, have been the most liberating three weeks she’s had since she got married over five years ago. And so, Veronica remains hopeful: hopeful that a bed at a shelter will become available soon; hopeful that, despite being out of the workforce for most of the last five years, she’ll soon find a job and begin her life anew.

I just don’t have the heart to remind her that we’re in an economic crisis with unemployment rates higher than any time since the Great Depression, so that job might not be so easy to find. And I certainly don’t have the heart to tell her that Governor Schwarzenegger recently cut 100% of domestic violence funding from the budget effective immediately, sending all of California’s domestic violence programs into fiscal shock. I don’t want to explain that with this budget cut—a cut reducing available funding by as much as 60% for some—shelters may have to close, and so that bed might not become available as quickly as she needs it to. I’m all for informed awareness, but I feel that kind of rational logic in the face of this woman who has already endured so much trauma and pain would just be unnecessarily mean. So I keep quiet.

As I’m driving home from my meeting with Veronica, I am overwhelmed by the thought that her story is but one of many similar tales across this so-called “golden state.” Indeed, the executive director of a shelter I have worked with has said that demand for help has skyrocketed, even as they’re forced to cut back services because of finances, operating on a bare bones minimum and requiring staff to take two furlough days each month. Worse, I learn that as the executive director was herself learning about the recent budget cuts on a conference call, she was informed by staff that one of their clients had been brutally murdered—in public—by her batterer.

In 2007, 110 such women were murdered by their husbands, ex-husbands and boyfriends here in California – that’s one woman killed every three days throughout the course of the year. I shudder to think what that number might be for 2008. And when I arrive home, I’m confronted by the grisly story of yet another woman brutally killed, her body beaten and strangled, her teeth and fingers removed before she was shoved in a suitcase and tossed in a dumpster – police suspect by her ex-husband, who was recently charged with a misdemeanor count of “battery constituting domestic violence” that is scheduled for trial in December. Too late, unfortunately.

Our country is experiencing an economic crisis on a scale most of us have never before seen, and California has been especially hard hit. This recession has taught us that we can no longer depend on our elected officials to ensure the existence of a social safety net to help protect the most vulnerable in our society. And, when resources do not exist for victims to receive domestic violence services, they are left with no choice but to return to their abusers. A part of me fears that may be Veronica’s fate, and I can’t help but wonder: what kind of people are we, that we can so easily disregard the lives of the most vulnerable – our elders, our mothers and nurturers, our children and future – with the callous flick of a pen or the deafening silence of our inaction?

Fortunately, there are bits of silver lining peeking through: earlier this month, the U.S. Justice Department awarded nearly $3 million to six California domestic violence programs, while state Senator Leland Yee has written two bills that would provide domestic violence funding –  one a horse-racing oversight bill that he gutted and rewrote to instead call for the restoration of the $16.3 million in funding for domestic violence centers that the Governor vetoed last month. But those remain tiny slivers of hope: Senator Yee’s bill needs the support of the Speaker of the Assembly, Karen Bass, before it can be moved forward for a vote. And the money received by those six programs from the Justice Department is reserved solely to bolster long-term transitional housing programs; many programs still need money urgently to provide emergency shelter and services.

Ultimately, it is up to us—as mothers, as women, as a community of interconnected human beings—to take a stand against abuse and to help protect the most vulnerable in our society. As economic hardship increases, so will violence against women and children and the elderly and those who are least able to protect themselves. We must stand up and speak out against such abuse now. We cannot wait for the recession to end or for our officials to grow hearts or for our state’s budget to be magically balanced before we take action. Instead, we as individuals must work together to create our own social safety net, and the time to do so is now.

*Name and identifying details have been changed.

Cherita Smith is a nonprofit fundraiser & do-gooding activist with a passion for social justice who has worked to raise funds and awareness on the issue of domestic violence (and the related issues of poverty, homelessness & hunger) since 2006, when she began work at a Southern California shelter for women escaping domestic violence.

CALL TO ACTION FOR CALIFORNIA RESIDENTS: Don’t let women like Veronica  down. Respond to Senator Leland Yee’s two senate bills authored to save domestic violence program funding. CLICK HERE to contact Speaker of the Assembly, Karen Bass, and let her know you support this urgent legislation.

Who Will Leave the Light on for Them?

“Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” ~ Martin Luther King, Jr.

The state of California is going through a real rough patch. First CalWORKS and Healthy Families was on the chopping block, now the Governor has decided that 100% of the state’s Domestic Violence funding is not needed.  It is – a moving target.

If you had the choice to flee with your children to live on the streets or to stay with your abuser – which would you choose? What if you had no family or support system to turn to for help? It’s already been reported that both child abuse and domestic violence have spiked during the recession. Cutting domestic violence programs will lead to silent deaths. Shelters will close. Where will these women and their families go?  A homeless shelter? My understanding is that many homeless shelters will not take battered women due to privacy, safety, and legal issues.  In San Francisco, for example, the homeless and victims of domestic violence (many of whom are, uh, homeless) are handled under two different departments – the Department of Homeless Services and the Department on the Status of Women, respectively.  Why? No clue. If anyone out there has more insight into this please post a comment below.

Where will they go?  Will the state’s most vulnerable women and children have to start camping out in their very own tent city before we – Jane Q. Public – will say that we’ve had enough? This IS a women’s issue. This IS a human rights issue. Who will leave the light on for them?

What YOU CAN DO (California residents):

1) Contact Senator Leland Yee and tell him you support his bill to save domestic violence programs.

2) Take action on StopFamilyViolence.org by filling out the online petition to send to the Governor and your state legislator.

CalWORKS Spared — For Now

Yesterday, guest poster Angie generously shared her personal experience as a CalWORKS recipient, and her well-founded fears that the program would fall victim to the California budget crisis. We were all set to post a blog entry with links to letter-writing campaigns urging the state legislature not to cut CalWORKS — but before we could hit “post,” we got news that the budget committee voted 6 to 1 to save the program!

This is of course wonderful news, but it’s tempered by the fact that many other crucial and extremely worthwhile programs are on the chopping block.

To stay updated on the budget situation (legislators are meeting right now to figure out what to cut and what to save), check out the Western Center on Law & Poverty’s frequently updated legislative blog. And, of course, keeping checking back here or follow our Twitter stream for action updates.

Katie Couric’s Spotlight on Kids, Part 2

Greetings from sunny California, the breadbasket of the world.

This week the CBS Evening News with Katie Couric continued their Children of the Recession report. Most recently, they interviewed a 13 year old boy, named Lewis Roman, living in a single room at a Philadelphia shelter, with his mother and several siblings. Lewis tells CBS:

“I don’t like letting nobody … know I’m hungry,” he says. Lewis told me about trying to fall asleep (and sometimes not being able to) as a way to deal with hunger. He told me how he’ll get so hungry that he’ll feel like throwing up.”

Ms. Couric continues:

Hunger in America isn’t what you might think. In extensive phone calls and while doing research for this story, I learned that a child may technically be eating something but can still be hungry – and thus damaging IQ and impairing cognitive growth. Perhaps a child’s last meal was a bowl or cereal or box of inexpensive noodles. While technically they may have eaten something, it wasn’t nutritious enough to help them develop. When a child is growing — it’s particularly important in years 0-5) – what little of nutritional value consumed is going to basic organ and body development, and the brain is starved of the nutrients it needs.

I have to admit, both Rachel and I weren’t sure if CBS and Katie Couric were going to be able to make good on their promise to keep coming back to these issues. Call me a cynic, but without the mainstream media shining a light on these issues, the American public will soon forget about these little stories after the news cameras go away. CBS and Ms. Couric, if you are reading, it would be an amazing public service if you spun off this segment into a special program, a la Harvest of Shame.

I keep thinking about this one article I read on poverty and hunger in America. These words keep coming back to me:

That kind of poverty is inherently less visually spectacular than a tent city. It’s less likely to get Oprah’s TV audience up in arms. But when the damage from the economic collapse is finally accounted, it is these millions of little stories that will likely leave the most enduring imprint on America’s social landscape.

Millions of little stories add up to something greater. In 20 years we will be older and our babies will have grown up. They will be living in a society with the kids who go hungry TODAY. We hear from all of our partnering agencies that the families who come to them for help are having to make tough choices between food and diapers.

This is *such* a big issue, let’s not bury our head in the sand. Here are some people who turned rhetoric into action:

The Lemon Lady collects fresh produce to donate to Contra Costa food banks. You should check out her blog to get some great ideas on non-profit gardening.

Taking a more punk rock approach, Secret Freegan, rescues food from grocery store dumpsters and donates it to homeless shelters. We follow this person on Twitter, and you should too. Check out their blog here, if only for the pictures of food waiting to go to the county dump.

Have you heard of anyone else who is doing good on this issue? Tell us about them here.

CA Safety-Net Program Cuts: Tell Us Your Story!

“A society in crisis should not throw women, children, and seniors overboard first.” ~ California Assemblymember Noreen Evans

This week there does not seem to be a whole lot of media coverage regarding the Governor’s proposed program cuts. Thank you San Jose Mercury News and the Los Angeles Times for practicing real journalism and covering the story.

Are you a parent who will be directly effected IF the state’s safety-net programs CalWORKS orHealthy Families are CUT out of the budget? Please TELL US YOUR STORY by posting a comment HERE (you can post anonymously).  We want to hear REAL STORIES from REAL FAMILIES on how this will directly change your life.

Per California Assemblymember Noreen Evans’ budget blog, here is a partial list of services that will be effected should the cuts happen:

· Elimination of the CalWORKs program;
· Elimination of the Healthy Families Program;
· Eliminating certain Medi-Cal state-only programs;
· Elimination of community based services programs at the Department of Aging;
· Eliminate State funding for Community Care Licensing;
· Elimination of remaining General Fund for Maternal, Child, and Adolescent Health;
· Elimination of funding for community clinic programs, such as Rural Health Services and the Seasonal and Agricultural and Migratory work programs;
· Elimination of funding for drug treatment programs established by the voters through Proposition 36;
· Reducing in-home supportive services eligibility and care provider pay;
· Reducing funding for foster care rates; and
· Reducing SSI/SSP monthly payments benefiting the aged and disabled to the minimum allowed under federal law.

Dear readers, please forward this post to anyone who may want to share their story.

Chop-Chop, California

Updated 10:00pm 5/27/09: MUST READ on budget cuts to health and human services: check out the blog of Assemblymember Noreen Evans, Chair of California Budget Conference Committee.

Today, while some of us will be changing diapers for California’s next generation of voters,  some of our legislators in Sacramento will be holding a hearing that will weigh in heavily on the future of California’s most vulnerable children and families.  What’s the scoop?

Just yesterday, Governor Schwarzenegger officially proposed to eliminate a bunch of state funded programs. On the chopping block include programs CalWORKS and Healthy Families.

According to their website, CalWORKS helps able bodied parents with children gain employment:

The CalWORKs program provides temporary financial assistance and employment focused services to families with minor children who have income and property below State maximum limits for their family size. Most able-bodied aided parents are also required to participate in the CalWORKs GAIN employment services program.

CalWORKS advocates argue that eliminating this program would send more of California’s vulnerable families out onto the street (Read: INCREASE of family homelessness).

California’s Healthy Families Program :

Healthy Families is low cost insurance for children and teens.
It provides health, dental and vision coverage to children who
do not have insurance and do not qualify for free Medi-Cal.

According to this fact sheetnearly 1 million California children would LOSE health insurance if the Healthy Families program were eliminated (READ: MORE children slipping through the healthcare system’s cracks).

Here is a GREAT article in the Los Angeles Times that puts a FACE and REAL LIFE stories to the Healthy Families program.

The legislative Budget Conference Committee (including members of the state Senate and Assembly) will be holding a public hearing on these proposed program cuts. Hopefully, they will be talking LONG and HARD about the long term impact such program cuts would have on family homelessness and child welfare in California.

What can YOU do to help?

  1. CONTACT YOUR LEGISLATORS:  Tell them you are VERY concerned about the immediate and long term impact eliminating CalWORKS and Healthy Families will have on family homelessness and child welfare. Click here to find out who your representatives are.
  2. CONTACT THE GOVERNOR:  Click here for Governor Schwarzenegger’s contact information.
  3. SPREAD THE WORD:  Blog about it, Tweet it, or Facebook this action item to your network.

Below is a list of legislators who are on the budget conference committee. If you reside in these cities, please take some time out of your day to contact your representative.

Assemblymember Noreen Evans (Democrat – Santa Rosa) – Chair

Assemblymember Kevin de León (Democrat – Los Angeles)

Assemblymember Bob Blumenfield (Democrat – Woodland Hills)

Assemblymember Roger Niello (Republican – Fair Oaks)

Assemblymember Jim Nielsen (Republican – Gerber)

Senator Denise Ducheny (Democrat – San Diego)

Senator Mark Leno (Democrat – San Francisco)

Senator Alan Lowenthal (Democrat – Long Beach)

Senator Bob Dutton (Republican – Rancho Cucamonga)

Senator Mimi Walters (Republican – Laguna Hills)

Please help us continue the dialogue by posting your comments below. We especially welcome those of you who work with families vulnerable to these program cuts.

Leave It to the Big O, Again!

Did anyone catch the Big O show last week on Heroes in Hard Times? Whether you watch the Big O show or not, you should check it out to catch some great ideas and inspiration on how YOU can help out others in these dire economic times (Hey YOU, buy some diapers!).The Big O partnered withPeople Magazine to highlight these amazing everyday people who saw a need in their own communities, and tried to fill it.

The stories highlighted in the show include a doctor who started a free clinic for his small working-class town; the owner of an auto repair shop who started a non-profit that donates refurbished carsto struggling families, and a little girl (pictured above) who started a charity to collect socks for the homeless.

The take away from these stories is that we ALL can help out in one way or another when we start at a place that we know. We started with diapers (recent tally 12, 154 as of 5/24/09).

How about you? What is a need you see that needs to be filled? Do you have a story of an everyday hero in your own community? Tell us about it here.

Thank You from Homeless Prenatal Program in San Francisco

HPP Staff with diapers! Keep it coming!

To all the folks who have purchased items via Amazon.com for Homeless Prenatal Program (HPP) in San Francisco, we just wanted to let you know that the diapers, wipes, and other supplies, are arriving everyday! Here is a personal note from our main contact there, Ms. Rebecca.

“The packages are still coming!  And in great numbers!  Your drive is such a success for us at HPP.  We have so many diapers and wipes right now that we don’t have to worry about running out and  telling mothers that we don’t have diapers, or even a diaper, for their children.  Can you imagine telling this to a family?  The worst thing is knowing that a child does not have a clean diaper.  This is not a problem right now, because the successful Help a Mother Out Drive is supporting HPP families by giving the community an easy way to give diapers, wipes, and other essential hygiene needs to families who are struggling.  Thank you.”

HPP’s Executive Director and Founder, Martha Ryan, previously told us that they are seeing more families who are having to make the choice between FOOD or DIAPERS. This is San Francisco, one of the richest parts of the world.

BECAUSE OF YOU, HPP does not have to tell a family that they have NO DIAPERS to give them for emergencies. Because of YOU, HPP has practical supplies for their tiniest clients.

THANK YOU for your help in MAKING A BIG DIFFERENCE in the lives of San Francisco families.

Remember, HPP is just ONE of the agencies we have been trying to help in communities around the state. Stay tuned for more updates!

What You Need to Know About Props 1D and 1E – Jargon Free

Today’s guest post is from one of our own HAMO contributors, Ms. Alicia.  Alicia works as a mental health professional in the San Diego area, so we asked her to research Props 1D and 1E to share with all of you. Remember, California’s special election is tomorrow, Tuesday,May 19, 2009. Help A Mother Out and VOTE TOMORROW!

 

*******

As a Mental Health Clinician, I have had the priviledge to work with so many diverse populations throughout our communities. Two of the most vulnerable and voiceless populations I have had the honor of working with throughout the years are children and the mentally-ill. Hmmm? Both have measure on the May 19th ballot that may, no, will cut funding. Coincidence? Ah, let me stop myself before I begin my “voiceless populations as scapegoats” rant and complete my task at hand.

There is a very low expected voter turn-out for the special election tomorrow so here is my PSA reminder to go out and give a voice to the voiceless.

I found this easy explanation of propositions 1D and 1E at  (as well as the other props on the ballot) for those of you that like information about propositions “jargon-free”, like me.

Prop. 1D: Children and families trust fund

By Ellen Noyes

The measure would take $268 million each year for five years away from First 5 (Prop. 10) programs—plus $340 million in unspent funds—to pay for children’s programs now funded by the state budget. Other changes would include using First 5 funds only for “direct services.” First 5-funded programs include early care and education, health, parent education, and family support.

  • A yes vote would cut First 5 funding

  • A no vote would keep First 5 funding

SUPPORTERS SAY: The measure would “temporarily provide greater flexibility in funding to preserve services for young children while helping balance the state budget,” according to the California Taxpayers Association website.

  • The state needs to make cuts in tough economic times.
  • First 5 is sitting on unspent dollars.

Supporters: CA Budget Reform Now (www.cabudgetreformnow.com), Association of CA School Administrators, CA Latino Child Development Association, CA State Conference of the NAACP, CA Chamber of Commerce

OPPONENTS SAY: The measure would “reduce funding for crucial children’s programs and cut children’s services,” says Anthony Wright, executive directorof Health Access. The measure would

  • Take away up to 60-70% of First 5 funds—868,000 children now receive First 5-funded services each year.
  • Cut California’s investment in children—though these programs save money in the long run because children do better in school, get better paying jobs, and are less likely to use welfare, foster care, or go to prison.
  • Eliminate important First 5 programs that “aren’t ‘direct service’—training teachers, building preschools, children’s health initiatives. Almost no other resources (fund) this,” says Sherry Novick, executive director of the First 5 Association of CA.
  • First 5 has unspent money because it budgets for multi-year programs.

Opponents: No on 1D (www.noonproposition1d.com), Health Access, First 5 Association of CA, CAEYC, CA Federation of Teachers, CA Nurses Association, CA League of Women Voters, AFSCME (state council)

Prop. 1E: Mental health services

By Elyce Petker

This measure would take $225-$230 million each year for two years away from programs funded by the Mental Health Services Act (Prop. 63). Instead, the funds would go to the existing state Early Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment Program (a child health program). Prop. 63 now funds almost a quarter of mental health services in the state.

  • A yes vote would cut mental health (Prop. 63) funding

  • A no vote would keep mental health (Prop. 63) funding

SUPPORTERS SAY: “We believe the financial crisis is going to grow and more children’s programs will be cut. (This measure would) fund programs at risk of being cut,” says Jose Plascencia, president of the Central California Hispanic Chamber of Commerce. The measure would

  • Save the state money in the long run
  • Help balance the budget and avoid tax increases.

Supporters: California Budget Reform Now (www.cabudgetreformnow.com), Association of CA School Administrators, CA State Conference of the NAACP, CA Chamber of Commerce

OPPONENTS SAY: “This (would) take money away from programs that help low-income families and children. It’s a temporary solution at the expense of our mental health programs,” says CA League of Women Voters senior program director Trudy Schafer. The measure would

  • Cost the state more in the long run because of the consequences of untreated mental illness—200,000 previously untreated people are now served by Prop. 63-funded programs.
  • Cut mental health programs to backfill a tiny portion of the state budget—and jeopardize federal matching funds
  • Be the first step to taking away all Prop. 63 mental health funds.

Opponents: No on Prop. 1E (www.noprop1e.com), Health Access California, CA Federation of Teachers, CA Nurses Association, AFSCME (state council)

Other proposition explanations can be found here.

Connecting the Dots

A few months ago, when Lisa and I were brainstorming about a diapers-and-wipes donation drive, we had no clue where this was all going—no thought of ending up on the radio, or inspiring otherdiaper drives in other cities, or stumbling into a thriving, dynamic network of people trying to make a real difference with seemingly small acts. We have met some incredible folks along the way who’ve kept challenging and encouraging us to see the connections between the personal and the political, the economic and the social.

Last Friday we had the honor of meeting in person one of our newly minted Internet superheroes, Julie of TangoBaby. We all met up at San Francisco City Hall to lend our support to a coalition of homeless families and their advocates who were holding a press conference. It was great to see up-close and off-line some of the peeps we’ve been Tweeting and emailing with; say what you will about the ease of online communication, it really can’t compare to talking face to face. We got the bonus of talking to some reporters about our diaper drive as we waited for things to get rolling—a number of them thought that we, with Lisa’s kids in tow, were part of the press conference, so we took the opportunity to explain that we were allies. (Lisa and kids did end up on TV, but only as background images.)

But for me, the real highlight of the day was getting to meet Mama K and her family—the folks who jump-started Julie’s quest, and who provided a huge inspiraton for me and Lisa too. I’m sure K doesn’t want to be the poster child for anyone’s movement; she’s just trying to live her life and secure the best possible future for her kids and herself. And it’s a big cliché to talk about how humbling it is to meet someone who is so gracious under enormous stress, and yet it’s undeniable that putting a face on a story—whether it’s of homelessness or illness or foreclosure—helps people to connect even more strongly. To see that it isn’t all text and tweets and html: It’s real life.

We Heart Purple

Have you guys heard of the Purple Bus? An Atlanta mom is currently on a national tour talking to people about healthcare.  She was recently in the Central Valley educating folks about healthcare reform. According to her website, tomorrow she will be in San Francisco. Just another mom doing her part!

Anyone out there have an Airstream trailer a couple moms could borrow to take their wild toddlers on a tour of California?

Invisible Families Part 2

Now that Mother’s Day is over, the word on the street is that everything goes back to business as usual. We certainly hope not, but as someone close to our campaign told me, “after Mother’s Day NO ONE in the media is going to be interested in your diaper drive.”

According to the National Center on Family Homelessness, not since the Great Depression have so many families been without a home. We may not see them in the tent cities that are scattered around the country and reported on in USA Today. If they are not newsworthy enough for the evening news, it does not mean that they don’t exist.

Many homeless families cannot be accounted for. They are hidden in the nation’s motel rooms,doubled up in single room occupancy hotels, living out of their cars, or couch surfing with friends and family while they wait for an opening in a homeless shelter. What is particularly arresting is that in some areas of California, after families have“graduated” from a homeless shelter’s program (e.g.,St. John’s Shelter for Women and Children), they have NOWHERE else to turn.

Please watch this video of David, Tish, and Natasha, interviewed by Mark Horvath ofInvisiblePeople.tv, at the Prado Day Center in San Luis Obispo. They do their best to raise their 15 month old daughter in the shelter system, while also helping out other homeless folks. Inspiring.

[vimeo http://vimeo.com/4569947]

There are more than a million of these little stories across America that remain untold and hidden from our view. There are families just like this one who are in your own community.

If you are laid off or underemployed shut down the pity party before it gets out of control.  Do something. It doesn’t take much to contribute your own gifts in your own community.